top of page

 

-----------

CHAPTER CITATION

Chee, Lilian. “The Public Private Interior: Constructing the Modern Domestic Interior in Singapore’s Public Housing.” In The Handbook of Interior Architecture and Design edited by Graeme Brooker and Lois Weinthal, 199-212. Bloomsbury, 2013. 

 

-----------

 

-----------

 

-----------

2013:

The Public Private Interior: Constructing the Modern Domestic Interior in Singapore's Public Housing

Public Private Interior.png

Images: Lee Ling Wei, Najeeb Rahmad, Kenneth Koh

The private domestic realm arose in tandem with industrialization, modernity, and the separation of work and home spaces in the nineteenth century. The cult of domestic privacy brought with it a series of spatial, social and material relationships such as the rise of commodity culture, gendered domains, and the onslaught of values related to class and taste. Outlining the history of European bourgeoisie privacy, this essay revisits the issues associated with the private domestic realm but does so by updating these questions within another cultural milieu. It will attempt to flesh out what ‘privacy’ or ‘the private’ may have meant in the context of Singapore’s public housing landscape, primarily during its first decade between the 1960s and the 1970s. How was this desire for the private realm realized? How was it foiled? It proposes that the private domestic interior is ultimately influenced by public doctrines with regard to state policy, architectural utopianism and consumerist-controlled ideas of ‘good taste’. With more than 80% of the population housed in Singapore’s highly successful social housing scheme, the Housing Development Board (HDB) flats are an anomaly in that affordable public housing assumes status quo rather than marginal standing. The state sponsored scheme is inevitably burdened with nationalistic values ranging from the mundane to the particular, and amongst others, associated with patriotic sentimentality, racial and class equivalence, orchestrated community, and the controversial preference for the heterosexual procreative family unit. As occupants subscribe to this social contract, self-expression is subsequently forced into dialogue with such values. This engagement is played out specifically in the imagery and meanings of the HDB’s private interiors, which embed and reveal the contradictions, tensions and consumptive desires of its populace. Drawing on material culture, feminist theory and architectural history, this essay will offer an original analysis of the private interior within Singapore’s distinctly public housing landscape.

 

-----------

Images: San Tzer Ning Jeremy

Web Design & Curation: Lin Derong | Lilian Chee © Singapore, 2026
bottom of page